Over the past few months, I’ve been trying to watch out for great websites among ministries and missions. I’ve formed some general conclusions; see if you agree.
*** The front page should be living and vibrant: By that, I mean it should change… *often*. At least once a week, if not more so. If it stays the same, your site is already dead. Take the Partners Int’l front page:
There are giant pictures with lots of face shots. You can look into the eyes of *people*. But notice how that it’s not just an art show. Every shot links to something unique on their site. Sponsoring a child, watching a mobilization video, providing relief for Indonesia — it all leads to deeper levels in the site.
*** The front page should reveal stories about people: I’m convinced… if a front page *only* becomes an art show, the site hasn’t done its job. I’m convinced that the front page needs to reveal *story* lines. Back to Partners Int’l for instance. “Meet our indigenous ministry partners” shares stories about people from various places. “News from the field” gives news updates, the “President’s blog” let’s the leader express a byline, and “Today’s Prayer Request” leads to tons of current and previous prayer needs.
*** The menu structure should be simple, clean, & meaningful: Back to Partners, how could one say it any better? “Who we are,” “What we do,” and “Where we work,” along with “News & Blog,” “Get involved!” and “Contact us.”
*** Give clear pathways for donating: Once again, Partners shines in this area. “Sponsor a child,” “Partner,” “Harvest of Hope,” and “Donate Now,” all at the top right, plainly visible, clearly set apart.
When I grow up, I’d want my website to be so perfect. 100%. A+.
How ’bout you? What do you look for in a ministry/mission website? Just follow the link below to the online version of this item, then click “Comment” and have at it.
Doug: Is there an organization that helps to evaluate websites and give suggestions for improvement?
Well, there’s this Website Grader that we’ve reported on in Brigada previously:
https://brigada.org/2010/11/07_5741
is partners.org built on the clover platform?
With a budget of over 15 million, they can afford a high-quality, constantly changing website. Something like that requires a LOT of time and effort, not to mention skill and creativity – all of which cost big bucks.
I don’t think these miss the top priority. The very first, very top priority is to say briefly and clearly: WHAT IS THIS WEBSITE ABOUT. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve gone to a website and haven’t been able to figure out its purpose. I should be able to see it clearly from the top of the home page. I shouldn’t have to scroll an inch or dig around in the About page to unscramble its reason for being.
Sorry, first line should be: “I think these miss the top priority.”
What a surprise and an honor to see our site on your blog/newsletter! Thanks for the kind comments, though I’m not sure I can agree that the site is “perfect”!
We built the new partnersintl.org site on Joomla, which is a popular open-source web platform. And I do want to say, Charles, that I think it’s possible for nonprofits to build cool and effective websites even with limited resources. The last couple of years have been difficult for us financially and we’ve had to build the new website with a very limited budget. In fact we didn’t spend more than 200 dollars on material costs. The communications manager gave input on the site and wrote a lot of the content. I managed the project and built pages and templates with lots of help from our Graphics/Multimedia person. It was all accomplished in house, though it was a fairly significant project. However, there are plenty of good free tools out there to help you do stuff like this. Ultimately, the website is only a tool to serve the mission of the organization, and we have to keep that straight. But we might as well make it the best tool that we can!
Also, Brad, thanks for your comment. I think I agree with you that the top priority of a website is to explain what it (and the organization) is about as quickly and clearly as possible, and then provide more details and avenues for further engagement. We tried to keep that in mind as we designed the homepage. If you have further comments or suggestions for improvement, please share!
Charlie Nelson
Webmaster (among other things)
Partners International
I love it, Charlie. It’s really cool when people assume a site must have demanded that you be an organization of $15 million, when in reality, it cost you less than $200. That says something about the level of excellence and care you put into every page. God be praised.
this organization http://www.academicsinasia.com used a themeforest plugin to get a theme and then upload their own custom photos for an inexpensive ($28) CSS design.
Check it out here: http://themeforest.net?ref=iphone4hd and all commission will be donated to brigada.
Wow Aaron. That’s very kind of you. God bless you brother!